<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web browser testing: It doesn&#8217;t have to look the same</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codegeek.net/blog/2009/web-browser-testing-it-doesnt-have-to-look-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codegeek.net/blog/2009/web-browser-testing-it-doesnt-have-to-look-the-same/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.codegeek.net/blog/2009/web-browser-testing-it-doesnt-have-to-look-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegeek.net/blog/?p=66#comment-57</guid>
		<description>You are so right, Mark. And as web designers and developers, it&#039;s our job to keep educating our clients. &quot;It doesn&#039;t have to look the same in every browser.&quot; I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s going to be easy, but it&#039;s worth doing.

It&#039;s such a practical approach, saves development time, and can save the client money. The reality is that when your mom visits the site, she isn&#039;t going to open two web browsers and then call you up and say &quot;Hey! It doesn&#039;t look the same in IE6 as it does in Firefox!&quot; As long as she can access all the content, utilize content-related functionality, and the site is consistent with the client&#039;s branding, we are meeting the client&#039;s business needs.

Almost all the big-name web designers and developers at the conference are now taking this approach including Jeremy Keith, Dan Cedarholm, Jeffrey Zeldman (Happy Cog), and Andy Clarke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so right, Mark. And as web designers and developers, it&#8217;s our job to keep educating our clients. &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t have to look the same in every browser.&#8221; I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s going to be easy, but it&#8217;s worth doing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s such a practical approach, saves development time, and can save the client money. The reality is that when your mom visits the site, she isn&#8217;t going to open two web browsers and then call you up and say &#8220;Hey! It doesn&#8217;t look the same in IE6 as it does in Firefox!&#8221; As long as she can access all the content, utilize content-related functionality, and the site is consistent with the client&#8217;s branding, we are meeting the client&#8217;s business needs.</p>
<p>Almost all the big-name web designers and developers at the conference are now taking this approach including Jeremy Keith, Dan Cedarholm, Jeffrey Zeldman (Happy Cog), and Andy Clarke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Streed</title>
		<link>http://www.codegeek.net/blog/2009/web-browser-testing-it-doesnt-have-to-look-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Streed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegeek.net/blog/?p=66#comment-56</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all well and good, sadly the reality is clients don&#039;t share this view.  And it will take some time, specially when so many are holding onto IE6 so tightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all well and good, sadly the reality is clients don&#8217;t share this view.  And it will take some time, specially when so many are holding onto IE6 so tightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

